Solo
exhibition, a.antonopoulou.art gellery, Athens, Greece,10.01 -
12.02.2011
The
recent work of Nikos Arvanitis, comprises
multi-edged natural landscapes, three-dimensional rocky mountains, flat
volumes, and small “stone” sculptures. Through his work, Arvanitis
suggests a contemporary visual allegory for the character of politics
as formed in the societies of our era. It is an era marked by the
decline of the 20th century political narratives, the disillusionment
of grand social visions, and the dismantle of the related ideological
and imaginary structures.
For certain, it is a transitional era. No longer is politics, both as
form and content, characterized by social participation; nor does it
express rival social goals and ideas. In its place, there stands what,
one may call, non-politics.
Arvanitis’s allegory departs from within the natural world, namely from
one of its most trivial materials: the stone. The stone is present with
its natural and psychological attributes, its geographical formations,
and its infinite figural manifestations. This long-lasting element,
possibly the most archaic and abundant on our planet (along with
water), becomes a conceptually useful symbol/ tool. For the stone can
signify (or even serve as a name for) nearly all the notable facets of
a historical era.
Rather frequently, art, as a narrative form of space and time, may be
seen as almost identical with the history of civilization and of
societies; it may be seen as a long voyage from the local to the
ecumenical, from longing to disappointment, from the ground of reality
to the realm of the imaginary and, often, to absolute absurdity. Art is
a relentless migration from the loci of realism to the isles of utopia
and from there to the spheres of the non-place.
In his approach, Arvanitis utilizes various aesthetic practices,
techniques, and media so as to materialize the gray zones wherein the
virtual and the real,the rational and the irrational, the partial and
the whole co-exist. In this manner, he interprets the post-political
situation he is concerned with. His method is of all-embracing as well
as meticulous observation. He intends to transform a visual approach to
a viewpoint of social criticism. Arvanitis’s take on the negative
prefix “non” of the non-place does not amount to a denial but rather to
an affirmation driving to “the production of the new”.